Real Estate Trends

Our National Report is out this week. From the press release:

Housing Prices Down by 2.1% in January

Inventory levels

Mountain View, CA February 9 2009. The Altos 10 City Composite Price Index showed a decline in asking prices of 2.1% in January and 2.4% during the most recent three-month period. Prices of properties listed for sale fell in 23 of 26 major markets according to the Real Time Housing Market Report, jointly published by Altos Research, the premier source for real-time real estate data, and market analysis firm Real IQ.

Asking prices fell at the fastest rate in Las Vegas, down 5.4% during January, and 8.8% during the past three months. This marks the tenth consecutive month that Las Vegas has posted the fastest rate of declining prices among major markets. Listing prices rose at the fastest rate in Miami, up 1.5% in January. Price increases in these markets are functions of a shift in the class of properties rather than traditional buyer demand.

"Despite continuing decreases in inventory levels, asking prices remained on a steep downward path in January," said Michael Simonsen, CEO and co-founder of Altos Research. "The trends appear to be continuing. We can find no signs of a turn-around in the data as of the first week of February."

Inventory levels declined in most major markets with the exception of Portland, Seattle, Charlotte and Salt Lake City. Across the 10 City Composite Index markets, inventory declined by 3.3% in January and 9.7% during the most recent three-month period. Inventory fell by more than 5% in Detroit, Boston, Atlanta and Cleveland during January.

"Inventory levels generally increase in January as sellers anticipate the seasonally strong spring selling season," said Stephen Bedikian, partner and research director for Real IQ. "So far we are seeing the opposite as inventory levels are continuing the decline they began in the summer of last year. The big test will come over the next few months as any increase in inventory will exacerbate the already large imbalance of housing supply and demand by adding to the existing overhang of available homes."

The median days-on-market rose in all markets during January staying above 100 or more days-on-market in every major market. By far, the market with the slowest rate of inventory turnover was Miami at a median of 189 days-on-market or more than six months. Miami has experienced the slowest market turnover in every month since September 2007. Salt Lake City enjoyed the fastest rate of turnover with a median days-on-market of 101.

The report is free, register here to download.

We released our monthly national real estate report earlier this week. You can download the PDF here. Prices continued to fall in most markets. The Altos National 10-city Composite price fell 0.8% from October through November. Inventories are declining a little as would be expected in the fall.

Report: National Real Estate Prices Decline 0.8% in November 2008

The Altos Research National Real Estate Report measures current real estate data in major markets around the country. November data shows Las Vegas continuing to lead the country in home price declines. Inventory levels declined in most markets into the winter slow sales months.

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA December 9, 2008 - The Altos 10-City Composite Price Index showed a decline in asking prices of 0.8% in November and 2.4% for the past three months. Prices of properties listed for-sale fell in 20 of 26 major markets according to the Real-Time Housing Market Report, published by Altos Research, the premier source for real-time real estate data, and market analysis consultancy Real IQ.

Asking prices fell at the fastest rate in Las Vegas - down 3.3% during November - and 6.9% over the most recent three-month period. This marks the eighth consecutive month that Las Vegas has posted the fastest rate of declining prices among major markets. Listing prices rose at the fastest rate in Houston - up 2.4% in November. Denver, Dallas and Houston are now the only markets showing three months of sequential price increases.

"Tight credit, job losses and plunging consumer confidence continued to pressure listing prices in most major markets during November," said Michael Simonsen, CEO and co-founder of Altos Research. "Recent government actions to reduce mortgage rates and slow the pace of foreclosures could finally start to stem the decline but we don't expect to see major changes until at least mid-2009."

Inventory levels declined in 24 of 26 major markets with only Phoenix and Las Vegas registering small increases. Across the 10-City Composite Index markets, inventory declined by 5.1% in November and 7.5% over the past three months. Inventory fell by the largest amounts in Boston, San Francisco and Seattle. "Inventory levels have continued to decline for many months and November was no exception," said Stephen Bedikian, partner and research director for Real IQ. "The real estate industry continues to work through the large inventory overhang but only very slowly."

Twenty-four of 26 markets had an average days-on-market of 100 or more. The average days-on-market rose in all but one market, Las Vegas, where it was effectively flat during November. By far, the market with the slowest rate of inventory turnover was Miami at an average of 179 days-on-market. Miami has experienced the slowest market turnover in every month since September 2007. San Francisco enjoyed the fastest rate of turnover with an average days-on-market of 92.

The report examines housing pricing, inventory levels and market conditions in 26 major U.S. metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs): Atlanta, Austin, Boston, Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Minneapolis, New York, Phoenix, Portland, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Tampa, and Washington, DC. The Real-Time Real Estate Report is released every month.

For years I've written about the function of NASDAQ stock wealth on prime Silicon Valley real estate. I like to summarize with this phrase, "You don't buy a $2 million home in Palo Alto with a $1.8 million sub-prime loan. You buy it with $1.35 million in NASDAQ capital gains and a $650,000 in financing."

That fact has buoyed real estate demand and prices from Saratoga through San Francisco in the past two years - even as the lower end of the market has been pummeled.

Consider this: two companies (and their stocks), Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Google (NASDAQ: GOOG), minted several thousand local millionaires between 2004 and 2007. (The back-of-the-envelope calculation works like this: Of GOOG's 16,000 employees assume 5,000 locals are mostly vested. Assume they collectively own maybe 8% of the company. At GOOG's 2007 peak of $711/share that's $18 billion in local wealth created since 2004. AAPL has a similar scale from an $11 stock in 2004 to $190 peak, spread over maybe 8000 vested local employees, is an additional $13 billion of local capital gains wealth created in the preceding four years.)

Many of those newly wealthy want to buy a home. The result is that simply from Google and Apple you have hundreds or even thousands of buyers at the high-end of the market.

Couple this demand with the peculiar small-supply situation of the local region (limited new construction yields only a handful of available properties) - and you get the recipe for resisting the bursting bubble right up through the first half of 2008.

Local Realtors know that the supply side of the equation is not likely to change drastically. There are simply no homes being added in close-in Silicon Valley unlike, say suburban Phoenix.

So the recipe depends on capital-gains-wealth-driven demand.

And guess what? Year to date for 2008, both GOOG and AAPL are down by half. In the last 9 months or so, $15 billion of local wealth in just those two stocks has evaporated.

The bubble burst has only started to hit us.

[note: I am aware this is an over simplified argument. Home prices do not correlate with the movements of any one stock. We've checked. In some of these markets, they do correlate with movements in the NASDAQ as a whole, and we all know this isn't an isolated dip.]

UPDATE: IPO June 30, 2009 - Here's the latest on the MacroMarkets Housing ETF

Getting closer to reality: Yesterday Bob Shiller's firm MacroMarkets announced that they've cleared the final approval for their exchange-traded funds based on the Case Shiller Index.

I've written in the past how huge this is. You can finally stem your real estate losses in a falling housing market. Or you can bet on the return of the market. And it's as easy as buying a stock on e-trade.

From the press release

MacroShares Major Metro Housing will provide investors with much needed access to the housing asset class, allowing for investment in either the upward or downward movement of home prices. The securities are designed to track the change in U.S. Home Prices as measured by the closely-followed S&P/Case-Shiller Composite-10 Home Price Index through the termination date. The paired securities will have a ten year term and will feature a 2x (200%) leverage factor.

...

Robert Shiller, co-founder and Chief Economist of MacroMarkets noted, "As recent events have proven, our global economy will benefit from modern, transparent, market based risk management solutions. Ongoing private sector innovation remains a vital complement to governmental efforts to modernize and protect our financial institutions, and I am confident that MacroShares will help meet a key 21st century economic challenge: delivering greater market access, new price discovery and liquidity to real estate."

Case Shiller based options and futures have been listed on the Chicago Merc for several years now. But the mechanics of that trade and account system have made it virtually impossible for anyone outside of Wall Street (aka the "End Users") to take advantage.

The funds are scheduled to IPO November 3. They'll trade with NYSE:UMM (which goes up when home prices go up.) and NYSE:DMM (which goes up when home prices decline)

These are unique financial instruments. In particular they don't own any real estate assets. This is not like a Gold ETF that buys gold and keeps it in an Amsterdam warehouse. Rather these funds hold cash (or treasuries). The cash moves from one to the other depending on the movement in the underlying Case Shiller 10-city composite. There are other peculiarities of these things too, but suffice it to say that these are the simplest, most direct way (only way?) to make money in real estate without going out and buying physical property. More complete review is here.

Obvious disclaimer: don't take my advice about financial instruments or investing.

...what's going to happen to condo prices in Manhattan?

We've noted elsewhere that New York city real estate has managed hold up reasonably well while Rome burns, though 2009 is looking a bit smoky for condos in the financial services capital of the world. On the horizon watch the three confluential variables:

1. The layoffs be a-comin'
2. Bonuses are heading down for those who remain
3. The dollar is strengthening

Here's what we know about the Manhattan condo market as of September 12, 2008.

• Year over year, we see condo prices in Manhattan (all zips) basically flat at a median price right around $1.6 million.
• That buys you on average, incidentally, a 1200 square foot, 2 bed, 1 bath place in a 64 year old building. Of course the "average" condo in Manhattan is as elusive as the "average" family in the country. Let me know when you meet one. By the way, we're talking condos specifically here. NYC's bizzarro-world co-op structure is examined in different data.
• They've been on the market, on average, for over four months. My guess is that this number skews higher than it might feel like if you're actually shopping in Manhattan, because, more than anywhere else in the country, the best properties move with behind-the-scenes, my-broker-knows-someone kind of deals.
• [self promotional aside: if you want to dig into all these details yourself, start on our free data for New York, and register. Subscribe to the Condos report for NYC and dive into the parts of town you care about. end promotion]

Where do we go from here?

• Securities Industry employment fell by 11% in the last bubble burst. Bear Sterns, Lehman, Merrill, AIG: they're coming fast and furious this time too.
• It's well known that bonuses drive much of the seasonal demand, on the Street in the
  past couple years a very simple, very common trade has been to short the builders and go long commodities. The evaporated funds behind the long commodities positions alone are going to eat big chunks from the 2008 bonus pool.
• Other things eating at this year's bonuses - M&A is way down, IPOs are non-existent. New product innovation ("Hey," says some underwriter at AIG, "let's insure these sub-prime loans against losses! We can't lose!") is crushed by internal or governmental forces. The liquidity that leveraged it all. Sheesh, I get
  exhausted just listing the down forces.
• International money (particularly Europe and Middle East) has been a prop for New York real estate for over a year now. For some in the world, Manhattan real estate hasn't been this cheap in a long time. Likely a small percentage of over all transactions, these push the margins enough to keep a floor on demand and therefore prices. But now: The last couple months have seen a dramatic turn in the dollar as the European economy weakens also.

So, look, the top-end of most regional markets has weathered the storm so far (see the discussion on my Fox TV interview). And Manhattan is notably the top-end for the region. But the fact is we're just starting this recession and this time around it's a financials-led recession. The few factors keeping Manhattan condos afloat into 2008 are evaporating in front of our eyes. My guess: Median price for Manhattan condo will down 20% in 2009. That part is just a guess. I'm simply finding it difficult to identify any factors to be sanguine about.

We have another cool slide show up at BusinessWeek.com this week. They asked us to dig out the local markets where homes are selling the fastest. Here's a newsflash, folks, even the highest demand markets are moving like molasses. A fun look at the data nonetheless. We looked at 20 metros around the country and picked out one or two zip codes where the rate of turnover wasn't abysmal.

Also, in case you missed the bulletin to the Altos Research fan club: I'll be on the Fox Business channel tomorrow morning (September 9) between 8:00 and 8:30am California time with Brian Sullivan. We'll talking the housing market, natch. Check it out. Let me know if you find the live stream on the FBN site.

We released our National Real Estate Report today. Here's the press release.

Real Estate Report: Housing Prices Down By 0.5% in June

Report measures current real estate data in major markets around the country. Data shows Las Vegas the weakest US housing market with real estate prices down 3.6% in June. Current real estate data shows Denver the strongest US housing market in June with prices up fractionally over May 2008.
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA July 8, 2008 - he Altos 10-City Composite Price Index showed a decline in asking prices of 0.5% in June and 0.8% for the past three months. Prices of properties listed for-sale increased in 15 of 26 major markets according to the Real-Time Real Estate Report, published by Altos Research, the premier source for real-time real estate data, and market analysis consultancy Real IQ.

Asking prices fell at the fastest rate in Las Vegas - down 3.6% during June - and 7.2% over the most recent three-month period. This is the third consecutive month that Las Vegas has held that dubious honor. Listing prices rose at the fastest rate in Denver - up 2.6% in June and 6.4% over the most recent three-month period.

"While the Composite Index continues to show price declines, the rate of decline has slowed recently and more than half of the markets we track are showing sequential asking price increases over the past three months," said Stephen Bedikian, partner and research director for Real IQ. "Housing markets are local, and this downturn remains largely confined to specific geographic areas of the country with four states in particularly bad shape: California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona."

Listed property inventories increased substantially with the 10-City Composite markets showing an increase of 5.7% during the past three months and 1.9% in June. Inventory rose in 17 of 26 markets with the largest jumps in Los Angeles and San Diego, up 8.7% and 6.1% respectively in June.

Data in the Real-Time Housing Market Report is based on analysis of over one million properties currently listed for-sale in 26 metropolitan markets across the country. The report is the most timely source of housing market data on current market activity.

For the Altos 10-City Composite, the average days-on-market was 109, a slight increase from 106 in May. Eleven of 26 markets had an average days-on-market of over 100. By far, the market with the slowest rate of inventory was Miami at an average of 154 days-on-market. Austin led all markets with the fastest rate of inventory turnover at an average of 72 days-on-market.

"Inventory continues to increase which is typical during the seasonally strong spring and summer seasons," said Michael Simonsen, CEO and co-founder of Altos Research. "The true test will come in the fall when the market experiences seasonal weakness. If inventory, especially foreclosure listings, piles up too quickly, prices may start declining broadly again."

The report examines housing pricing, inventory levels and market conditions in 31 major U.S. metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs): Atlanta, Austin, Boston, Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Houston, Indianapolis, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Minneapolis, New York, Phoenix, Portland, Salt Lake City, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Seattle, Tampa, and Washington, DC. The first report was published December 7, 2007 and is released every month. Report downloads are available at: www.altosresearch.com.

The other day, I highlighted the announcement from Bob Shiller's MacroMarkets to list exchange traded funds on the housing market. I've now had a chance to investigate more deeply and I'm giddy like a schoolgirl. (Albeit an incredibly geeky schoolgirl, but giddy nonetheless.)

First, some foundation as to why this matters.

In all businesses you have risks you can control and costs you can't: food, energy, interest rates, etc. For those costs, it makes sense to hedge. Successful jet fuel hedges are a big reason Southwest Airlines is the strongest in the country. Consumer products (e.g. cheaper airline tickets, wacky mortgages) get created on the foundation of these tools. (i.e. derivatives are a good thing.) Speculators can also participate - they add potential return to their portfolio where a hedger removes risk. Speculators create liquidity for the hedgers. (i.e. speculators are a good thing.) Financial derivatives, futures, options, swaps, etc. exist in nearly every asset class to solve these problems for people.

Likewise, lots of people and companies have real estate "exposure". This is a $21 trillion asset class people. You should be able to hedge. Especially now, people realize housing prices don't always go up. But before 2006, there were no financial products that let you hedge your real estate risk. And the only way to speculate was to buy investment property.

In 2006, MacroMarkets introduced, on the Chicago Merc, housing derivatives. Unfortunately it turned out that there were practical limitations on the housing futures that prevented nearly all potential "end-users" from participating. (The big banks could trade amongst themselves, but how fun is that?) Namely, you need big capital requirements, special trading accounts, most of the time you need a broker-dealer on the other side of your trade, and the payoff is not significantly leveraged. Perhaps I was a bit harsh to characterize MacroMarkets as having "dropped the ball" but, as of today, mere mortals basically still can't hedge their real estate risk. So how do you eliminate these hurdles?

Enter Exchange Traded Funds

ETFs are securities that trade like stocks on stock exchanges. You can play the oil price trends or diversified stock market positions simply buy buying a single "stock".

Here's how MacroMarkets' new ETFs ("MacroShares" as they call them) work for the housing market:

• The shares will list on the NYSE Arca. You can buy them from any brokerage account, like you would any stock.
• They're designed to follow the Case Shiller Index - specifically the CSI 10-City Composite, the national index. more on the implications of this below.
• The shares are issued in pairs: ticker symbol NYSE:UMM goes up when housing prices go up, NYSE:DMM goes up when housing prices go down.
• Like any stock, there's a market specialist so you always have price liquidity. You don't need to line up Goldman or Merril to take the other side of your bet.
• The shares have a par value of $25/share so when the market is heavily bearish the DMMs will trade at a premium to the $25.
• They have a 10-year horizon so you can play the longer term cycles of the housing market.
• The underlying assets get parked in short term US Treasuries, so the securities actually return a quarterly dividend.
• So the very easy trade is if you're bearish, simply buy the DMMs. Think you're seeing the bottom? Buy the UMMs. Ahh... simplicity.

Exercise some caution however, because there are nuances of how these things will behave. Namely:

• They trade in pairs that offset each other. This means if home prices double, the DMMs will go to zero and the security closes out. This happened in MacroMarkets oil MacroShares this year. AMEX:UCR and AMEX:DCR. (Those securities have market values in the billions now, so people are obviously adopting them as useful instruments.)
• That means also that the upside is limited to a 100% move. You can improve your return with margin leverage like any stock.
• As these things approach close (because of A. time or B.100% market moves) the pricing will exhibit optionality. They'll behave less like the market and more like an option.
  

But is the Case Shiller Index Useful?

The remaining challenges for these products are oriented around the data. It's easy to bitch about the Case Shiller Index: doesn't include condos, or new construction, or flips, etc., etc., etc. Add in local market peculiarities and a lot of people wonder if the CSI actually measures the housing market.

My take on this argument is that Case-Shiller is not useful for making a home purchase decision. But that doesn't preclude its usefulness in financial instruments. The fact is that the CSI 10-City Composite peaked in June 2006, and that's widely regarded as the national turning point for this housing market cycle.

The classic example of the localness problem came when Brad Inman asked Bob Shiller on stage and his conference in Miami, "So let's say I bought a $2 million home in Sausalito in 2005. How would I hedge that?" Ill distill Shiller's 10-minute-Yale-finance-prof reply into two words for you: "You can't."

With Given that these new securities are based on the CSI 10-City Composite, which is down strong in the last 12 months, they're not going to be helpful to hedge in Sausalito, which is doing just fine, thank you.

But if you're a reasonably diversified investor, brokerage, lender, builder, supplier, or yes, even if you're a speculator, this is a great way to measure US housing broadly. Given success in the market, there's no reason why they can't list regional funds too at some point in the future, to get a little closer to home.

Finally, of course, the backward-looking nature of all typical housing market data presents opportunities for clients of the Altos real-time real estate data. Rock on.

This is big, folks. Huge.

I don't imagine that this innovation is going to save anyone from foreclosure. But we're looking at the only effective way to manage your real estate assets without physically selling off properties. Think about that. Won't that be amazingly useful?

Look for these to get listed sometime in Q3 or Q4 2008. You can be sure that we'll be watching, and of course publishing data to help you trade.

More coverage: Here, here, and here.

We're have an internal game here at Altos - Guess the San Jose Market Bottom. It's quite clear that you can't predict the market bottom by looking at the price chart alone, but what else should you look at? Inventory provides a clue. Check this out:

The seasonal cycles are pretty clear, no? Usually there's a summer plateau in the number of homes for sale, then properties drop off through the winter.

The question is, Is that the first inkling of a summer plateau this year?

If inventory levels flatten out this sumer then maybe, just maybe, the worst of the carnage would be over. That inventory could work its way out over the next couple years. What do you think? Is the recession going to make this chart jump even higher this fall?

Here's where you can keep an eye on the live San Jose real estate data.

The data from Q1 2008 is in. We published our National Real Estate Report today. Key Highlights:

• The Altos 10-City Composite dropped by 1.3% in March and 1.7% in the first quarter of this year.
• Biggest price declines we saw this month are in Las Vegas and San Francisco.
• Dallas, Houston, and Charlotte continue to hold their own. Each city had a modest price increase in March.
• We see some Days-on-Market stabilization. This implies that the springtime has eased the carnage just a bit.

Read the full National Real Estate Report (PDF Download).

Here's the press release.

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA – April 3, 2008 – The Altos 10-City Composite showed a decline in asking prices of 1.7% over the past three months and continued that decline in March with a decrease of 1.3% for the month. Prices of properties listed for-sale fell in 14 of 23 major markets according to the Real-Time Real Estate Report, jointly published by Altos Research, the premier source for real-time real-estate research, and market analysis consultancy Real IQ™.

Asking prices fell at the fastest rate in Chicago - down 3.9% during March - driven by a large increase in for-sale property inventory of 12.3%. The largest quarterly declines occurred in San Francisco and Las Vegas, off 5.3% and 5.2% respectively. Prices were also down by more than two percent for the quarter in San Diego, Detroit, Los Angeles, Tampa, Washington, D.C. and Minneapolis. Listing prices were up by at least one percent for the quarter in Charlotte, Dallas and Houston.

As the typically strong spring selling season gets underway, we are seeing sellers marking down prices to move their homes,” said Michael Simonsen, CEO and co-founder of Altos Research. “The seasonal inventory buildup is only going to exacerbate the near-term supply-demand imbalance and put more pressure on sellers to reduce their price expectations.”

For-sale listed property inventories increased in 17 of 23 markets during March and all markets showed increases during the first quarter. The Altos 10-City Composite experienced an increase of 4.7% for the month and 7.4% during the first quarter.

Data in the Real-Time Housing Market Report is based on analysis of over one million properties currently listed for-sale in 23 metropolitan markets across the country. The report is the most timely source of housing market data on current market activity.

For the Altos 10-City Composite, the average days-on-market was 118 – an improvement from 121 in February and 124 in January. Miami and Detroit experienced the longest time-on-market spans with an average days-on-market of 146. San Francisco led all markets with the fastest rate of inventory turnover at an average of 65 days-on-market, followed closely by Austin at 67 days. Listing price reductions by San Francisco sellers over the quarter appears to be stoking demand and reducing average time-on-market.

The slight decline in average days-on-market is a positive sign,” said Stephen Bedikian, partner and research director for Real IQ, “but it’s likely to be only temporary as the inventory build up overwhelms tepid demand and drives time-on-market back upward.”

The report examines housing pricing, inventory levels and market conditions in 23 major U.S. metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs): Atlanta, Austin, Boston, Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Houston, Indianapolis, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Minneapolis, New York, Phoenix, Portland, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Tampa, and Washington, DC. The first report was published December 7, 2007 and will be released every month.

Altos Links:

National Real Estate Data

Dallas Real Estate Data

Houston Real Estate Data

Charlotte Real Estate Data

Today's look inspired by conversations with a subscriber in Charlotte North Carolina. (In case you haven't noticed, we've started publishing the Charlotte Real Estate Reports now.)

Given the sorry state of the national housing market, how is Charlotte faring?

Let's look at some of the towns around Lake Norman: Huntersville, Cornelius, and Davidson.

At around $300,000, Huntersville and Cornelius are nice upscale markets in a pleasant part of the world. Davidson is a little higher-end and is showing some signs of weakening prices off about 5% from last autumn. Davidson also has the highest days-on-market measure for all three towns. At 140 days, these properties are definitely not flying off the shelves.

But as you can see from the price chart, home prices in this part of the country seem to be holding up. Why is that?

We see two common themes of housing markets avoiding the big crush this winter:

1. They're markets that didn't climb spectacularly high during the boom.
2. They're steady growth economies.

What's a steadily growing economy mean? Well for one thing, it means people are moving in to the area. Check this population chart from Ersys.

So the Charlotte area has those two things in it's favor. What's next? Where does the market go from here?

Like most of the country, home buyers are in no hurry in Charlotte. We measure relative demand levels with our Market Action Index. When this index drops below 30, we call it (ever optimistic) a "Buyer's Market". The lower this index goes, the lower the current levels of demand and the more likely you are to see home prices decline in the near future. I'm afraid on this point, our Charlotte area towns aren't faring any better than most of the country.

As we mentioned with Austin, Texas the other day, some markets haven't yet been hit by the big hammer. If we escape a painful recession, maybe home values in these markets don't collapse. Unfortunately there's nothing in the early numbers that indicate home prices will climb significantly from here in the near term.

The New York Times last week carried a story on the tale of two housing markets.

AUSTIN, Tex. — The real estate market these days is a tale of two Americas, and one of them is not doing too badly.

In the America of big-city housing markets, especially on the coasts and in the struggling industrial Midwest, the huge run-up in values in recent years has given way to big drops in prices and sales volume. Millions of people owe more than their houses are worth.

But in the other America, specifically in cities like Austin; Grand Forks, N.D.; Yakima, Wash.; and Salem, Ore., the available evidence suggests the real estate market is holding up. Prices there never boomed as crazily as they did in the big cities, and now, even though volume is down almost everywhere, prices in many of these towns are firm or rising.

We'll leave aside the fact falling prices in the struggling industrial towns and the falling prices on the coast are barely related to each other and focus instead on the last statement.

Are home prices in Austin, Texas indeed holding up? Let's look:

From our perspective, Austin is indeed holding up better than some of the most bubbly markets, like Phoenix and San Diego.

Keep in mind though that in every market, the answer is: it depends. It depends on your price point, it depends on your neighborhood. In fact if we dive into Austin a little deeper, we find where that even though the prices haven't adjusted deeply, we can see where market demand is indeed cooling.

Days on market is climbing steadily across all price points. Despite a seasonal improvement in market time, The high end of Austin is on the market for a pretty long time right now. Buyers are in no hurry.

Furthermore, in Austin, when you look at the price quartiles, you can see the top of the market is squeezing but the bottom remains reasonably solid. This often implies, as the Times suggests, that the underlying economy is strong, immigration is positive, and people aren't so worried about their jobs. Here's the chart of home prices in Austin, by quartile. Note the slight squeeze at the top end of the market.

So I'll conclude with a cautious agreement with the Times. Yes indeed there are markets so far escaping major carnage. Many of these markets didn't have the incredible upside in the past few years, so that stands to reason. Finally though, nearly all markets are showing signs of weakness. The key worry for all these markets is that they're following the economy, not leading it. If a recession evolves into full bloom, I don't see how anyone is spared.

Links:

Austin Real Estate Report

San Diego Real Estate Report

Phoenix Real Estate Report

In the Dallas real estate market? D Magazine's Dallas Dirt blog is a great read. Among the insidery local rumors and excellent house porn, Candy Evans has been tapping our AltosCharts lately for some insightful interpretation of the housing market trends at the local level for all y'all Texans.

[aside: as a snobby Californian, this is what I instinctively think of when I think Dallas homes. But this makes me want to move there.]

Link: Our free Dallas Real Estate Research

Last week we published the February editition of our National Housing Market report [PDF download]. I was traveling and forgot to add it to the blog, so here it is. We've expanded the coverage this month and added a few more cities ebyond the initial 20 covered by the Case Shiller Index. We'll add a few more important cities in the upcoming versions of the reports too.

Here are the highlights from this month's report.

• Listing prices declined in 19 of 22 markets during January. Prices only increased in the New York metro area during January and were flat in Dallas and Phoenix.

• The largest monthly decline of 3.6% occurred in San Francisco. Over the three month period, listing prices in San Francisco have fallen by 6.1% from $708,551 to $665,100. The other California markets of Los Angeles and San Diego logged declines of more than 2% for the month of January.

• Property inventories declined in most markets except in the Northwestern markets of Seattle and Portland. Inventories tightened sharply in the Midwestern markets of Cleveland and Detroit with decreases of 10.4% and 5.4% respectively during January. Seasonal declines in listing inventories are typical during the winter months.

• Markets with the longest time-on-market are Miami and Minneapolis at an average of 144 days-on-market. Miami’s days-on-market only increased slightly from the previous month’s 143 days while Minneapolis jumped over 5% from 136 to 144 days. Sixteen of 22 markets had an average days-on-market of over 100.

• Denver led all markets with the fastest rate of inventory turnover at 61 days, followed closely by Dallas and San Diego at 80 days. The sharp decrease in Denver’s days-on-market indicator – almost 39% during the past three months – coupled with an inventory reduction of over 11% during the same period, should be a positive for listing prices in the coming spring selling season.