So Cal Real Estate

The New York Times last week carried a story on the tale of two housing markets.

AUSTIN, Tex. — The real estate market these days is a tale of two Americas, and one of them is not doing too badly.

In the America of big-city housing markets, especially on the coasts and in the struggling industrial Midwest, the huge run-up in values in recent years has given way to big drops in prices and sales volume. Millions of people owe more than their houses are worth.

But in the other America, specifically in cities like Austin; Grand Forks, N.D.; Yakima, Wash.; and Salem, Ore., the available evidence suggests the real estate market is holding up. Prices there never boomed as crazily as they did in the big cities, and now, even though volume is down almost everywhere, prices in many of these towns are firm or rising.

We'll leave aside the fact falling prices in the struggling industrial towns and the falling prices on the coast are barely related to each other and focus instead on the last statement.

Are home prices in Austin, Texas indeed holding up? Let's look:

Comparing home price trends in Austin Texas, Phoenix Arizona, and San Diego CA

From our perspective, Austin is indeed holding up better than some of the most bubbly markets, like Phoenix and San Diego.

Keep in mind though that in every market, the answer is: it depends. It depends on your price point, it depends on your neighborhood. In fact if we dive into Austin a little deeper, we find where that even though the prices haven't adjusted deeply, we can see where market demand is indeed cooling.

Days on Market for homes in Austin Texas. Data as of February 15 2008. Each line is a price quartile. First Quartile are the most expense 25% of homes on the market.

Days on market is climbing steadily across all price points. Despite a seasonal improvement in market time, The high end of Austin is on the market for a pretty long time right now. Buyers are in no hurry.

Furthermore, in Austin, when you look at the price quartiles, you can see the top of the market is squeezing but the bottom remains reasonably solid. This often implies, as the Times suggests, that the underlying economy is strong, immigration is positive, and people aren't so worried about their jobs. Here's the chart of home prices in Austin, by quartile. Note the slight squeeze at the top end of the market.

Real Estate Price trends in Austin Texas as of February 15 2008

So I'll conclude with a cautious agreement with the Times. Yes indeed there are markets so far escaping major carnage. Many of these markets didn't have the incredible upside in the past few years, so that stands to reason. Finally though, nearly all markets are showing signs of weakness. The key worry for all these markets is that they're following the economy, not leading it. If a recession evolves into full bloom, I don't see how anyone is spared.

Links:

Austin Real Estate Report

San Diego Real Estate Report

Phoenix Real Estate Report

Last week we published the February editition of our National Housing Market report [PDF download]. I was traveling and forgot to add it to the blog, so here it is. We've expanded the coverage this month and added a few more cities ebyond the initial 20 covered by the Case Shiller Index. We'll add a few more important cities in the upcoming versions of the reports too.

Here are the highlights from this month's report.

• Listing prices declined in 19 of 22 markets during January. Prices only increased in the New York metro area during January and were flat in Dallas and Phoenix.

• The largest monthly decline of 3.6% occurred in San Francisco. Over the three month period, listing prices in San Francisco have fallen by 6.1% from $708,551 to $665,100. The other California markets of Los Angeles and San Diego logged declines of more than 2% for the month of January.

• Property inventories declined in most markets except in the Northwestern markets of Seattle and Portland. Inventories tightened sharply in the Midwestern markets of Cleveland and Detroit with decreases of 10.4% and 5.4% respectively during January. Seasonal declines in listing inventories are typical during the winter months.

• Markets with the longest time-on-market are Miami and Minneapolis at an average of 144 days-on-market. Miami’s days-on-market only increased slightly from the previous month’s 143 days while Minneapolis jumped over 5% from 136 to 144 days. Sixteen of 22 markets had an average days-on-market of over 100.

• Denver led all markets with the fastest rate of inventory turnover at 61 days, followed closely by Dallas and San Diego at 80 days. The sharp decrease in Denver’s days-on-market indicator – almost 39% during the past three months – coupled with an inventory reduction of over 11% during the same period, should be a positive for listing prices in the coming spring selling season.

A paper in the Journal of Emergency Management came across my desk today. Measuring the Efficacy of a Wildfire Education Program in Colorado Springs

Timely, considering the state of Southern California right now and of Tahoe earlier this summer.

The program sounds like a fascinating way to increase awareness of the fire risk (awareness being the key factor in reducing the controllable variables). Preparation for disasters like this is of course subject to the Black Swan effect:

...most people are uncomfortable making risk estimates of uncertain events such as wild fires... They may think, "There has never been a wildfire where I live, so it is very unlikely that there will be one in the future."

So what can public policy do to motivate people to better manage their exposure? In Colorado Springs, they evaluated every parcel, 35,000 of them, and gave each a rating. Now the city can tell me I have a very-high-risk property and get me thinking about trimming the pine boughs back from my cedar-shingle roof. Then they publish that information. When I go to buy a home in the area, I can factor that into my purchase. That's positive.

But is it effective? And how do we measure changes in risk perceptions? The authors of the paper took a novel approach.

Rather than simply measuring changes in risk perceptions, we examine the effect of the program on the housing market. This provides a more complete picture of how the CSFD approach to education affects homeowner attitudes toward wildfire risk.

A market-based approach. Nice. Incent homeowners to fix the easy stuff that makes up most of the wildfire risk. Very cool.

And the results?

Perhaps the most striking result is that pre-assessment home prices and wildfire risk were positively correlated. In other words, houses with higher wildfire risk also had higher sales prices. The reason for this is [otherwise desirable features also increase fire risk]...building on a ridge may increase the wildfire risk, it also provides better views.

In contrast, post-assessment there is no such correlation. Post-assessment wood roofs and wood siding now have a negative impact on price. As a result, people are migrating to safer building materials.

Good stuff. Too bad it's a lesson a bit too late for the disasters this week. We'll keep an eye on the data to see if we can discern any immediate impact on home prices in San Diego from the fires. Will report back soon.

Jessica at Inman this morning reports that, in a fit of fear of a bursting bubble, the SoCal MLS has stopped publishing it's Days on Market stats.

Even if you give them the benefit of the doubt that a Days On Market stat can be misleading as a standalone indicator of housing market conditions, the move is just plain silly. Bite the bullet guys, sweeping bad news under the rug doesn't make the bad news go away. It just makes it harder to manage intelligently for home buyers and sellers.

So since you can no longer get a view from the SoCal MLS, you'll have to get it from us. And we, of course, don't present DoM as a standalone indicator.

Among lots of other market data, when we survey a market, we calculate an mean Days on Market vs. a median Days on Market. (The mean, remember, is the average. It'll skew higher if just a few porperties are on the market for super long times. The median is the measure of half the market. So half the homes are on less than X days.) It's fascinating to watch in a changing market, for example, the median drop while the average stays high. That illustrates the freshest properties--and the ones priced right--are turning over quickly while the stale, overpriced, unappealing properties are lingering.

Because I know you're interested, here's a chart illustrating the median Days on Market for some key Southern California real state markets. You can see we're past the seasonal Spring Fling of new properties coming on and the Dog Days are approaching. Though higher than it's been for years, 2+ months is actually not that crazy painful (easy for me to say). This is the median, remember so there are lots of properties hanging around for several (many) months.

Southern California Homes Days on Market as of July 15 2007

[update] Here's average DoM too, note the effect of stale properties staying on the market and skewing the average higher than the median:

Average Days on Market for Los Angeles, Irvine, Pasadena, Thousand Oaks, California July 15 2007

Further Research Details available here:

Los Angeles Real Estate Market

Irvine Real Estate Market

Pasadena Real Estate Market

Thousand Oaks Real Estate Market

The S&P/Case-Shiller index for March 2007 was released today. The San Francisco Home Price index showed it's first increase in a year and came in at 211.09 vs. 210.78 in February. This increase should come as no surprise to our clients (or readers of this blog for that matter.) We whispered to clients on February 26 that the March numbers looked like they were heading higher.

(For the uninitiated, the Case Shiller index tracks existing single family home prices. The index compares prices now to January 2000 where the index = 100. These indexes are then traded as options and futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.)

Broadly speaking, this is not a big surge in San Francisco Bay Area home prices. No

Tracking Home Prices for the San Francisco Bay Area.

In other notable markets reported today with the S&P Case Shiller Index: Los Angeles, Miami, and San Diego were down the biggest of the 10 major metros that are traded on the Merc. Full data table is here.

Money Management firm and Bond King PIMCO has staked out one of the most bearish positions on the Housing Market of any of the serious Wall Street players. Theirs is also one of the most well quantified. The thoughtfulness bears paying attention to. Pun intended.

PIMCO founder and CIO Bill Gross does a monthly economic outlook podcast which I look forward to the first week of each month. Intricate, playful, and self-referential, Gross constructs his essays in a mini version of the Hofstadter style. To grossly oversimplify, Gross has been generally bearish on the economy, primarily driven by his view of housing market recession for over a year. [aside: the article and podcasts are here. But I'm I the only one who finds Apple's iTunes UI absolutely horrible? It takes me hours to navigate through that morass.]

Today, I'd like to call attention to an article by PIMCO portfolio manager Mark Kiesel. He writes this month that he's "still renting." Citing the litany of housing bubble factors (affordability, excess money, rampant speculation, easy lending, inventories, vacancies, delinquencies, etc.) Mark assumed we'd hit a housing market peak and sold his home in 2006 (in Los Angeles presumably). He has been renting ever since. Mark considers that he'll be renting for another year or two. We'll posit here that Mark is wrong: he's looking at 5 or more years.

It turns out that Mark is one of the few who has the cojones to put his money where his bed is. We've had the discussion at the Casa Simonsen breakfast table. Here's how the scenario plays out:

Me: There's a reasonable chance that we'll lose maybe half a million dollars in home equity over the next few years.

The Wife: You think it's that much? Really?

M: Well, there are plenty of scenarios where the housing bubble pops in a catastrophic way. Or it could be flat for 10 years. Remember we never thought the NASDAQ could lose 80% of it's value.

TW: Well then, Mr. Smarty Pants, that business of yours better pick up the slack. 'Cause we're not going to go live in an apartment.

M: Righto. [goes to get coffee]

TW: No coffee for you. Coffee is for closers.

...And life goes on. (That Wife is a funny one.) Despite the fact that we're acutely aware of the capital at risk, we ain't taking any action.

Our situation underscores the trouble with Mark's plan. Even assuming that PIMCO's fundamental analysis is spot-on and the worst case bubble scenario happens, Kiesel faces the speculative problem of market-timing. What if Kiesel is right, but off by say, four years? In fact, Kiesel addresses the condition, but misses the implication:

Over time, housing prices and interest rates should decline, resulting in improved affordability. This adjustment, however, will take time and occur over a period of years, not months. Housing is illiquid and prices are sticky. As a result, potential buyers should exercise patience and not jump back into the housing market too early. A year ago, I described the state of the US housing market as “the next NASDAQ bubble.” The NASDAQ took over 2 ˝ years to go from peak to trough. I suspect that housing prices could display a similar pattern, and we are still over a year away from the bottom. Given these risks, I prefer renting versus owning, and an investment strategy which favors defense versus offense.

Home Prices as measured by ECRI

So now it's 2011 and your kids are half-grown, you're not in the school district you wanted, but you're a few hundred grand richer. Or maybe not, because a stable home environment has given you the opportunity to focus on building wealth in other areas (see The Wife's comments above).

Much Ado

So much of the housing bubble crowd is fueled by vitriol and schedenfreud, that PIMCO's fundamental analysis is refreshingly pure and compelling. But it doesn't address the problem of what to do about it.

That's why we're so bullish on the housing futures markets emerging. We've discussed some new fangled hedging strategies, but the fee structure makes them cost prohibitive. I'm just hoping some decent consumer-retail products develop before catastrophe strikes. It could be that in a few years, home value insurance products are part of every transaction. Like PMI, but for the buyer, not the lender.

In the end, maybe the housing bubble like Mark Twain with the weather: so many people complaining, but no one doing anything about it.

Some readers have asked lately about a recent jump in our Days on Market statistic. I thought it makes sense to explain it here. We recently did a methodology change where we increased the look-back window for watching properties.

By making this change, we more accurately reflect the actual total time on market, even for properties that have come on and off the market, especially including those that have been off the market for 30 days before being relisted.

In January 2007 we increased our look-back window. We'll now identify more properties as they've come on and off the market. Thus the big jump in our Days on Market statistic.

What we found was that in some markets, we can find a significant chunk of properties that have really been on the market for long periods and these properties were previously under-reported in our stats. We've seen a notable decline in the number of properties relisted (with the sole intention of "refreshing" a listing) in Silicon Valley since last fall when the local MLS changed its rules. In San Jose California we've observed a drop from nearly 25% of homes on the market having been relisted down to 9%. That's real progress.

Those rules however do not impact a property that for example was on the market all last summer, was pulled off over the holidays and put back on the market in January. A soon-to-be-announced Altos partner calls these properties "stale fish." We've adjusted our nets to catch more stale fish. We're still dolphin-safe though.

This change effected our the trend charts in most communities a little bit. In some areas, though, you might notice a big jump in the DoM stat that week in January 2007. This change is the reason for the jump. Inset is a snapshot of the current Days on Market trend for San Jose Homes.

What does one get for a million bucks these days? That's the question on our mind as we went spelunking through the database today. We grabbed 5 more or less random markets in the Bay Area, San Diego, Los Angeles, Seattle, and Chicago that have a quartile of the market with a median price at $1 million this week. Here's what you can expect if you wanted to drop a mil on a home in those markets.

Some fun things to note:

• The properties in these market chunks all average approximately 4 beds / 3 baths.
• The Chicago zip code 60614 is Lincoln Park, a part of town that has always been among the ritziest. So for around a million bucks, you could live in a very cool single family (detatched) home, in a killer location. Any part of this zip code that wasn't always tony went through massive gentrification in the late '80s and early '90s. I particularly like this place. That's where I'd go if I transplanted my Bay Area mortgage back to Chicago. $1million is the bottom of this zip code.
• For a million bucks in Huntington Beach, however, you'd get a place built in the '70s. This is the lowish side of the market too. So anything scraped and rebuilt in the last 15 years in Huntington is significantly more pricey that our sample for the day. 'Course it is February and that's gotta be worth a premium over Chicago today.
• The Des Moines section of Seattle on the other hand has a wide range of properties. But the nice long stretch on the water provides some great opportunities for the high-end of the market here on the south side of town.
• Santa Rosa is the most exurban of the zips in our sample today. Over 50 miles from San Francisco, the area provides some good opportunity to build on big lots at reasonable (for the Bay Area) prices. Which is great if you work in the wine business or don't mind a mega-commute.

We've been covering Southern California for a while now, but I don't comment on the markets down there nearly enough. So here's some info on the current Pasadena housing market. (Note the charts on our free housing market research page use 90-day rolling averages, so their trendlines will differ somewhat from this week's numbers I cite below.)

Median home price in Pasadena has held flat around $800,000 since last summer. While days on market is climbing like everywhere else in the country (almost 11 weeks!), there's still some amount of action, especially at the low end of the market.

Pasadena housing market snapshot January 16, 2006

Where are the trends pointing? Well available inventory is about to begin is seasonal climb. And while I find that days-on-market statistic a bit troublesome, this is always the time of year when the old stuff sits around.

Pasadena Homes for sale by price quartile January 16, 2007

The high-end of the Pasadena market, nice (though a bit aged) $2 million homes on big lots, are getting a bit stale at 12 weeks on the market. This condition is probably making some sellers nervous. If you're a buyer and not worried about a bubble burst in the next six months, you can probably find some people willing to deal!

The trends are amplified in the Central part of town where the 91106 zip code generally has the ritziest properties. Average time on market for the great spreads in the $5 million range is pushing half a year. If you need 8 beds and 8 baths just north of LA, have I got a deal for you!